Wireframe review feedback — every note captured before the designer starts revisions.
Wireframe review feedback written on a whiteboard is richer than Figma comments — you can sketch alternatives, annotate the interaction, and group related feedback visually. BoardSnap captures it all.
Why designers love this workflow
Wireframe reviews done at a whiteboard — where reviewers sketch alternative layouts, annotate the whiteboard wireframe with concerns, and draw the interaction they're imagining — produce better design feedback than Figma comment threads. The whiteboard format lets reviewers be more concrete.
BoardSnap preserves that concreteness. Snap the wireframe review board and get a structured feedback document: usability concerns with their page location, layout alternatives sketched during the review, and open questions about user intent or technical constraints. The designer has a complete, specific revision brief.
The exact flow
- Print or draw the wireframe on the board
Print the wireframe at whiteboard scale, or sketch it quickly on the board. The wireframe is the canvas — reviewers annotate directly on it.
- Have reviewers annotate and write concerns
Reviewers write concerns on sticky notes and place them on the relevant wireframe area. Write alternative layouts next to the existing design.
- Categorize feedback on a separate section
As the review progresses, move feedback into categories on a separate board section: Usability, Layout, Copy, Interaction, Technical Constraints.
- Sketch accepted alternative directions
When a reviewer's alternative is accepted, sketch it on the board in more detail. This becomes the direction for the next wireframe iteration.
- Snap the review board
Both the annotated wireframe section and the categorized feedback section. The BoardSnap summary is the revision brief.
What you'll get out of it
- Wireframe feedback categorized and captured — not scattered across Figma comments
- Alternative layout sketches captured in the board photo with written description
- Accepted direction changes documented explicitly
- Open questions about user intent captured for research follow-up
- Revision brief ready before the designer's Figma session starts
Frequently asked
Can I use BoardSnap for paper prototype reviews as well as whiteboard wireframe reviews?
Yes. Any flat writing surface works — printed paper prototypes annotated by reviewers are read as well as whiteboard wireframes. Snap the annotated paper prototype and get the same structured feedback output.
How do I handle wireframe reviews where different reviewers have contradictory feedback?
Write each perspective with the reviewer's name or role. Mark conflicts as 'unresolved' on the board. BoardSnap captures the conflict, and the designer knows to get a decision before revising.
Can BoardSnap read annotations written on printed wireframes?
Yes. Handwritten annotations on printed pages are read by BoardSnap AI. The combination of printed content and handwritten feedback is a common and supported format.
Designers: try this on your next wireframe review.
Three taps. Action items in your hand before the room clears.