Feature design review
Eight components reviewed, three approved, three flagged for revision, two blocked on open copy questions. BoardSnap captured all eight with their status and generated follow-up tasks for the revision items.
BoardSnap is an iOS app that turns whiteboard design reviews into structured decision records: what was reviewed, what passed, what's blocked, and who owns what next.
A design review has a specific output: a decision. Ship it, revise it, or block it. But most whiteboard design reviews end with a verbal decision that evaporates on the walk back to your desk.
Somewhere between the whiteboard and the follow-up Slack message, the nuance gets lost. "Revise the header" becomes a vague ticket. "Blocked on legal review" doesn't make it into the Figma file. The decision was made — it just wasn't recorded.
Design reviews need a paper trail. The whiteboard is the best surface to run one. BoardSnap closes the gap.
Write the screens or components under review with their version number or iteration. Clear scope makes BoardSnap's output cleaner.
Annotate directly on the board. Use a consistent sign: checkmark = approved, X = rejected, circle = revision needed, question mark = needs input.
Before snapping, write 'SHIP', 'REVISE', or 'BLOCK' next to each item. BoardSnap reads these as the primary action item state.
BoardSnap captures the full board in one shot. VisionKit corrects angle and perspective so the annotation text is readable even from meeting-room distances.
BoardSnap returns a per-item summary: the decision, the reason (if annotated), and the open issues or blockers attached to it.
Paste the decision record into your design tool, ticket system, or Slack. Blocked items become in-progress action items tracked in the BoardSnap project.
A formal review record: each design item with its decision status (approved / revise / blocked), attached feedback, assigned owner, and follow-up action items. The output is structured enough to paste into a design handoff doc or a JIRA ticket, and specific enough that reviewers can confirm the record reflects what was said.
Eight components reviewed, three approved, three flagged for revision, two blocked on open copy questions. BoardSnap captured all eight with their status and generated follow-up tasks for the revision items.
A compressed two-hour review of the full app before launch. BoardSnap's output became the official sign-off log, referenced in the launch ticket to confirm all design items had been reviewed.
A critique is exploratory — gathering feedback without a final call. A review is decisive — each item gets a go/no-go. BoardSnap reads both, but the review workflow is built around explicit decision markers (SHIP / REVISE / BLOCK) that drive the action item states.
Yes. Snap each board separately — they all live in the same project. Use the project AI chat to ask 'what items are still blocked?' and get a cross-board summary.
Snap a quick follow-up board with the updated call. BoardSnap stores each snap as a distinct board, so the revision history is intact.
BoardSnap doesn't have native integrations yet — the output is structured text you copy to wherever you work. The format is designed to paste cleanly into Figma's design file comments, Jira tickets, Linear issues, or Notion docs.
Snap the board, ship the action items in ten seconds.